|
Galveston waking up to serious lead issue |
By Alexis Grant
The Houston Chronicle
Published
01/27/08
GALVESTON — Nearly one in
five children in Galveston has enough lead in their blood to cause learning
disabilities and behavioral problems — an alarming statistic that officials have
known for years but have done little to improve.
Across the country,
officials in other cities have managed to reduce the number of poisoned children
by making housing lead-safe, testing children who are most at risk and applying
for grants to fund those programs.
In Galveston, they're just
waking up to the enormity of the problem: lead-poisoning rates that are nearly
10 times higher than the national average — a toxic legacy of the city's old
housing.
"It's almost mind-boggling
that it would be sitting there with these kinds of averages," said Ruth Ann
Norton, executive director of the Baltimore-based Coalition to End Childhood
Lead Poisoning. "They need to do some things now."
The issue finally is
gaining traction because of a well-publicized report released by Baylor College
of Medicine in November. That prompted local officials to create a task force to
develop a plan.
Other small municipalities
have found themselves in similar predicaments, partly because most federal
lead-abatement money goes to large cities. Galveston now has a chance to become
an example for small cities, task force members say.
"We're
at a crossroads for an opportunity to really develop a model program," said Dr.
Mark Guidry, chief operating officer of the Galveston County Health District,
who was appointed co-czar of the task force.
The 1-in-5 statistic,
provided by Baylor researchers and based on data from the county health
district, isn't new. Red flags have been raised for years by The University of
Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, which published similar test results. But
until now, few people noticed.
"We wanted to kind of open
up the problem to the world," said Winifred Hamilton, lead author of the report
and director of environmental health at Baylor. "Nothing was being done. It had
been decades and decades that they'd known about the problem, (and) children
continued to be poisoned."
The study was based on
data, gathered between 1997 and 2003 by the county health district, that showed
the percentage of children with high lead levels hovered around 19 percent.
History
of lead
Old houses are the root of
the problem — and Galveston has a lot of them. About three-quarters of the
city's housing was built before 1978, when residential lead-based paint was
banned. Even more dangerous are houses built before the 1950s, when paint
contained as much as 50 percent lead.
Many of this coastal
community's old houses are inhabited by low-income residents who can't afford to
renovate. Some don't know they're living in homes where young children can be
poisoned by eating just one paint chip off a peeling window sill.
Lead dust, too, can
contaminate food, carpets where children play and soil outdoors. Residents who
do construction work at home unknowingly exacerbate the problem.
City Manager Steve LeBlanc
said Galveston officials have taken several steps to address the problem,
including regulating power-sanding and making some houses lead-safe through the
federally funded Healthy Homes program.
But he acknowledged that
more could have been done.
"Over the last 15 or 20
years, obviously, what we've put in place has not gotten the job done," said
LeBlanc, who has been in office for 10 years.
Once the task force makes
its recommendations, he plans to make them a priority, he said.
Lead has long been known
to cause irreversible neurological damage and behavioral problems, including
lowered IQ, hyperactivity and even criminal behavior. Children are the most
vulnerable because their brains are developing.
Often, however, children
show no outward physical symptoms except when the levels of lead in their blood
reach extremely high levels. They can then experience headaches, fatigue,
vomiting, convulsions and even death.
The lack of obvious
symptoms makes it difficult for some parents to understand the severity of the
illness.
"She acts like a normal
child," said Roshonda Domingeaux, whose 2-year-old daughter, Viviana Hill, was
diagnosed recently with lead poisoning after a routine doctor's visit. "You
can't tell."
Domingeaux knows the old
house they live in could account for Viviana's exposure. One possible culprit is
the beige paint peeling off the ceiling above Viviana's bed.
A nurse from the Galveston
County Health District is expected to visit her home soon to help determine the
source, a service provided for children with high blood-lead levels.
The lead task force, which
met for the first time early this month, likely will focus on educating the
community and improving testing of young children. There's also a push to
implement lead-safe housing regulations and remove lead from the island's many
old buildings, a costly task that could require outside funding.
Difficult criteria
Galveston likely will have
difficulty obtaining federal funding because screening methods used by some
health professionals there don't meet federal standards. That means some
children who are diagnosed aren't counted by the state or the CDC.
The federal agency counts
only tests done by venous sample, blood taken from a vein in the arm, or two
capillary samples, which take blood from a finger prick.
But many of Galveston's
tests include just one capillary sample, and not enough children there are
tested, said Teresa Willis, manager of the blood lead surveillance group for the
Texas Department of State Health Services, which collects data from laboratories
and sends it to the CDC.
For that reason, CDC
records show just four children in Galveston County were diagnosed with lead
levels of at least 10 ug/dl (micrograms per deciliter) in 2005.
Local and state officials
acknowledged far more children were diagnosed that year, although no one has an
accurate total count.
"We
know we may have many more (cases)," said Dana Wiltz-Beckham, chief
epidemiologist for the Galveston County Health District. "What's the true
picture? That's a valid concern."
Task force members are
debating whether Galveston should adopt a mandatory screening program, perhaps
for children entering daycare. Children enrolled in Medicaid already are
required to be screened at 1 and 2 years, but many toddlers still don't take the
$7 test.
Screening data are used by
federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, to decide which cities receive money for lead abatement and
education programs.
"If they indeed have a
high prevalence rate, they'd want to be able to demonstrate that," said Brian
Sullivan, an HUD spokesman. He said Galveston was eligible for the agency's main
lead-abatement grant but likely wouldn't qualify without better data.
Other federal monies also
are out of reach because of Galveston's small population, about 60,000. One
popular grant administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
funnels money for lead abatement to the state health department, which in turn
gives it to Texas' three most populous counties because they have the most
poisoned children.
Pushing
requirements
Experts agree that
screening is crucial to understanding the scope of the problem and locating
hazardous homes, though some would like to see an emphasis on lead abatement as
a preventive measure.
Experts say Galveston
officials should consider further ordinances to encourage abatement, including
laws that require homes to pass a lead test before being rented or sold. In some
cities, officials have released the names of landlords who own properties that
contain lead, both to notify residents of the problem and push owners to take
responsibility for cleanup.
About 20 percent of the
children in Galveston who tested positive for lead lived in properties owned by
12 landlords, according to the Baylor study.
For More Information Contact: Kurt Koopmann Public Information Officer Galveston County Health District
409-938-2211 or 409-392-0007
kkoopman@gchd.org |